
تعداد نشریات | 13 |
تعداد شمارهها | 155 |
تعداد مقالات | 1,556 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 2,435,575 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,035,286 |
More about Text, Textuality and Discourse Analysis | ||
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 13، شماره 1، خرداد 2025، صفحه 1-21 اصل مقاله (657.3 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30466/ijltr.2025.55643.2835 | ||
نویسنده | ||
Kazem Lotfipoursaedi* | ||
Ottawa Language Assessment Center, Canada | ||
چکیده | ||
Study of language, like any other discipline, has naturally been developing ever since its inception. But it assumed an accelerated pace from the early twentieth century onwards with two or more paradigm-shifting outlooks, among which the ‘socio-contextual surge onto the consideration of language functioning’ led to the emergence of an approach which came to be known as ‘discoursal’. Within the framework of this outlook, new trends and concepts as well as new definitions have evolved in Applied Linguistics in the last five decades: discourse, text, meaning, function, speech act, linguistic vs. communicative competence, discourse analysis, cohesion, coherence, genre, register, etc. This paper, after clarifying its position on the concept of “discourse vs. text”, will set out to discuss the dimensions of discoursal perspective on language, to examine the perspectives of variations in textual presentation of discourse (or rather “the construal of context”), to engage in some discourse-analytic deliberations on both production and comprehension phases, and to consider some reasons, or rather applications, for discourse analysis. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
discourse؛ text؛ discourse analysis؛ context؛ function؛ textuality | ||
مراجع | ||
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bakhtin, H. M. (2002). Dialogism. Routledge.
Bazerman, C. (2012). Genre as social action. Gee, J., P. & Handford, M. (eds.) (2012) The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge Publishers, 226-238.
Biber, D., & Conrad,S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.
Birch, D. (1993). Drama praxis and the dialogic imperative. In Ghadessy, M. (1993) (ed.). Register analysis. Pinter Publishers. 43-56.
Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. (ed.). Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge University Press. 56-130.
Butt, D. ; Fahey, R.; Feez, S.; and Spinks, S. (2012) Using functional gramma : An explorer’sguide. (3rd edition). Macmillan.
Candlin, C.N., & Lotfipoursaedi, K. (1983). Processes of discourse. Journal of Applied Language Study. Vol. 1 (2), 103-133.
Chapman, S., & Routledge, P. (eds.), (2005). Key thinkers in linguistics and the philosophy of language. Edinburgh University Press. 80-86.
Chen, Y., and Foley, J. A. (2005). Problems with the metaphorical reconstrual of meaning in Chinese EFL learners’ expositions. Ravelli, L. J., and Ellis, R. A. (eds.) (2005). Analysing academic writing. Continuum Press. 190-209.
Chomsky, N., (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton Publishers.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Cicourel, A. V. (1973). Cognitive sociology. Penguin Publishers.
Devira, M., & Westin, E. (2021). A genre and appraisal analysis of critical review texts in academic writing from a systemic functional linguistic perspective. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 22-36.
van Dijk, T.A. (1977). Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. Longman Publishers.
Elliot, H.C. (1974) Similarities and differences between science and common sense. Turner R. (1974). (Ed.). Ethnomethodology. Penguin Publishers. 21-28.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis, the critical study of language. Longmans.
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in linguistics 1934-1951. Oxford University Press.
Garfinkel, A. (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. Cole, P. & Morgan, J. I. (ed.) (1975). Syntax and semantics. 3: Speech acts. Academic Press.
Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (eds) (1972). Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Blackwell.
Halliday, M.A.K., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic science and language teaching. Longman Publishers.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1971). Linguistic function and literary style: an inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. In Chatman, S. (ed.). Literary style: A symposium. Oxford University Press. 330-368.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. Edward Arnold Publishers.
Halliday M.A.K (1985 & 1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold Publishers.
Halliday, M.A. K. & Matthissen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnolds Publishers.
Harris, Z. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language 28, 1-30.
Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
Hasan, R. (1995). The conception of context in text. In Fires, P. H., Gregory, M. & Halliday,M.A.K. (eds.).1995. Discourse in society: systemic functional perspectives. Ablex Publishing Company. 183-283.
Hyland, Ken. (2002). Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing.
Flowerdew, J. (ed.) (2002). Academic discourse. Longmans Publishers. 115-30.
Kress, G. & Threadgold, T. (1988). Towards a social theory of genre. Southern Review, 21/3, 215-243.
Leech, G.N. (1970). “This bread I break” ---Language & interpretation . In Freeman, D.C. (1970) Linguistics and literary style. Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc. 119-128.
Leech. G.N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman Publishers.
Leech, G.N. (1992) Pragmatic principles in Shaw’s You Never Can Tell. In Toolan, M. (ed). Language, text and context: Essays in stylistics. Routledge. 259-280.
Lotfipoursaedi. K. (1982). Applying an analysis of writer-reader discourse processes to a pedagogy of reading. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lancaster, UK.
Lotfipoursaedi, K. (1992). Analysing literary discourse: implications for literary translation META. 37(2), University of Montreal, Canada, 193-203.
Lotfipoursaedi, K. (2005). Explorations in meta-discoursal and meta-textual strategies: Implications for ESL writing pedagogy. A paper presented at TESL Canada Conference, May 26-28 ,2005, Ottawa, Canada.
Lotfipoursaedi, K. (2008). Discourse and the act of translating: A discoursal approach to the characterization of translation equivalence. Tabriz Islamic Azad University Press.
Lotfipoursaedi, K. (2015 a). Towards the textuality of a text. (2nd edition). Tabriz: Zaban Academic Press.
Lotfipoursaedi, K. (2015 b). Suggestions toward some discourse-analytic approaches to text difficulty: with special reference to T-units configuration in the textual unfolding. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 1-18.
Lotfipoursaedi, K. (2019). Textuality: the ‘form’ to be focused on in SLA. A paper presented in Azerbaijan Shahid Madani University of Teacher Education. 29-30 April, 2018, Tabriz. Published in Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature:Dynamics and Advances, 2019, 7(1), 7-19.
Lotfipoursaedi, K. (2021). Characterizing the ‘focus-on-form’ as the SLA classroom strategy: Should this be ‘grammaticality- or textuality-oriented’? Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 9(1), 43-63.
Lotfipoursaedi, K. & Sarhaddi, T. (2000). Redundancy, its discoursal functions and textual realizations in different genres. The Journal of Humanities of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 7 (1), 31-41.
Lotfipoursaedi, K. & Moghaddasi, Sh. (2004). Lexical chains, their discoursal values and cognitive effects: Explorations in the setting of a short story by Edgar Allen Poe. Bulletin of Faculty of Persian Literature& Foreign Languages, University of Tabriz. 190, 71-87.
Martin, S. R. (1985) Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Deakin University Press.
Martin, J. (1986). Grammaticalizing ecology: The politics of baby seals and kangaroos.
Threadgold, T., et al. (eds.). Semiotics—ideology—language. The Pathfinder Press.
Mitchell, T.F. (1975). Introductory. In Principles of Firthian Linguistics. Longman Publishers.
Mukarovsky, J. (1977) Standard language and poetic language. In Garvin P.L. (ed. & trans) A Prague school reader in esthetics, literary structure, and style. Georgtown University Press. 18-30.
Oliveira, A.L.A.M. & Miranda, M.V. (2022). “Calling a spade, a spade”: impoliteness and shame on Twitter. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 22-32.
Pomerantz, A. & Fehr, B. J. (2011). Conversation analysis: An approach to the analysis of social interaction. In Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. Sage Publications, 165-190.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4),696–735.
Saussure, F. de, (1916). Course in general linguistics. Translated by W. Baskin (1966). McGraw-Hill.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095.
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
Searle, J.R. (1969) Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Seidlhofer, B. & Widdowson, H.G. (1999). Coherence in summary: the contexts of appropriate discourse. In Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. & Ventola, E. (eds). Coherence in spoken and written discourse. (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 63). John Benjamins, 205-219.
Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Widdowson, H.G. (2004). Text, context, Pretext: Critical issues in discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.
Wilkinson, S. &Kitzinger, C. (2013). ‘Conversation analysis’. In Hyland, K. & Paltridge, B. (eds.) (2013). Discourse analysis. Bloomsbury, 22-37.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. Wodak, R. &Meyer M.(eds.). Methods for critical discourse analysis. Sage, 1-33.
Zaidi, A., & White, P.R.R. (2021). Attitudinal positioning and journalistic commentary in politically fraught circumstances: Editorializing about the killing of Osama bin Laden. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 89-102. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 55 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 85 |