| تعداد نشریات | 14 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 205 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,940 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,352,391 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,727,300 |
تحلیل ساختاری برنامهریزی شهر بیوفیلیک در راستای زیستپذیری کلانشهر شیراز با رویکرد فراتحلیل | ||
| جغرافیا و آینده پژوهی منطقهای | ||
| دوره 4، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 15، آذر 1405، صفحه 144-165 اصل مقاله (2.24 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30466/grfs.2026.56997.1205 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رستم قهرمانی1؛ علی وخشوری* 2؛ عبدالرسول قنبری2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه جغرافیا، واحد لارستان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، لارستان، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه جغرافیا، واحد لارستان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، لارستان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با رشد سریع شهرنشینی، برنامهریزی شهر بیوفیلیک به عنوان چشماندازی برای تقویت ارتباط انسان و طبیعت مطرح شده که میتواند نقش مهمی در ارتقای تنوع اکولوژیکی و زیستپذیری شهری ارائه دهد. در این راستا، پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل ساختاری برنامهریزی شهر بیوفیلیک در راستای زیستپذیری کلانشهر شیراز با رویکرد فراتحلیل تدوینشده است. روش پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر نوع توصیفی- تحلیلی مبتنی بر کتابسنجی و دلفی بوده است. در بخش اول بهصورت تحلیل نظاممند، 175 مقاله از پایگاه Scopus شناساییشده و با استفاده از نرمافزارهای bibliometrix و VOSviewer تحلیل شدند. در بخش دوم، 16 شاخص کلیدی با تکنیک MICMAC تحلیل شد و سناریوهای آینده با نرمافزارScenarioWizard شناسایی گردید. جامعه آماری خبرگان حوزه برنامهریزی شهری میباشد که با روش نمونهگیری هدفمند 70 نفر بهعنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شدند. نتایج تحلیل مقالههای منتشرشده بین سالهای ۲۰۱۵ تا ۲۰۲۵ نشان داد که پژوهشهای مرتبط با برنامهریزی شهر بیوفیلیک و ارتقای زیستپذیری شهری رشد قابلتوجهی داشتهاند و تمرکز اصلی آنها بر زیرساختهای سبز، توسعه پایدار، تابآوری اقلیمی، حکمرانی شهری و راهکارهای مبتنی بر طبیعت برای بهبود کیفیت زندگی شهری بوده است. نتایج تحلیل ساختاری نشان داد که شاخصهای پایداری برنامهریزی زیرساخت شهری و حکمرانی شهری مبتنی بر طبیعت بیشترین تأثیرگذاری و شاخص توسعه مدیریت اکوسیستم شهری بیشترین تأثیرپذیری را دارند. در تدوین سناریوها، سناریوی خوشبینانه شامل فعالسازی کامل پیشرانها و منجر به زیستپذیری بالا میشود، درحالیکه سناریوهای میانه و بدبینانه بهترتیب بهبود نسبی و کاهش شدید زیستپذیری را نشان میدهند؛ بنابراین، با تقویت برنامهریزی شهر بیوفیلیک و تمرکز بر شاخصهای زیرساختی، حکمرانی طبیعتمحور و مدیریت اکوسیستم، میتوان زیستپذیری کلانشهر شیراز را در آینده ارتقا و بهبود بخشید. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| فراتحلیل؛ برنامهریزی شهر بیوفیلیک؛ زیستپذیری شهری؛ کلانشهر شیراز | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahzadeh Fard, A. (2024). Examining Tehran’s compliance with biophilic urbanism indicators and their impact on its sustainable development. Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 55, 189–204. https://doi.org/10.30495/jupm.2024.32579.4411.[In Persian]
Abdollahzadeh, M., Rahnama, M., Ajza Shokouhi, M., & Mousavi, M. N. (2020). Assessment of social sustainability Indicators in Cities of West Azerbaijan province. Human Geography Research, 52(4), 1257-1273. https://jhgr.ut.ac.ir/article_72511_en.html?lang=fa [In Persian]
Akbari, M., Boostan Ahmadi, V., Chamran Mousavi, S., & Hajipour, N. (2018). Assessment of livability status of Shiraz metropolitan areas from citizens’ perspective. Planning for Welfare and Social Development, 9(37), 124–154. https://doi.org/22054/10/qjsd.9899/2018. [In Persian]
Almulhim, A. I., & Cobbinah, P. B. (2023). Can rapid urbanization be sustainable? The case of Saudi Arabian cities. Habitat International, 139, 102884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102884.
Almulhim, A. I., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2025). Understanding smart governance of sustainable cities: A review and multidimensional framework. Smart Cities, 8(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8040113.
Barbiero, G., & Berto, R. (2021). Biophilia as evolutionary adaptation: An onto- and phylogenetic framework for biophilic design. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 700709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700709.
Bayramzadeh, N., & Foadmarashi, M. (2023). Spatial analysis of the development of townships from the perspective of physical indicators of livability (Case study: The townships of West Azerbaijan Province). Journal of Geography and Regional Future Studies, 1(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30466/grfs.2023.54809.1007. [In Persian]
Bayramzadeh, N., Mousavi, M. N. (2024). Investigating the Relationship Between Development and Resource Allocation in the Creation of New Human Settlements During the Years 2011 to 2021 (Case Study: Iran). Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 13(49), 120-139. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ges/Article/1107624 [In Persian]
Bazayi, M., Ghasemi Sichani, M., Shojaei, A., & Maddahi, S. M. (2021). Examining lifestyle changes and their effects on architectural form and spatial configuration of vernacular houses (Case study: Qajar and Pahlavi era vernacular houses in Shiraz). Geography Quarterly (Regional Planning), 11(42), 45–71. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22286462.1400.11.2.3.3. [In Persian]
Cabanek, A., & Newman, P. (2016). Biophilic urban regeneration: Can biophilics be a land value capture mechanism? Sustainable Development Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.2495/sdp160061.
Capol, L., Keshav, S., & Nagy, Z. (2025). Activity hours: Assessing liveability during heatwaves. Building and Environment, 269, 112339. https://doi.org/1016/10/j.buildenv.112339/2024.
Carter, V., & Henríquez, C. (2022). Can strategic environmental assessment (SEA) contribute towards the implementation of biophilic urbanism in urban planning? The case of Chilean municipal regulatory plans. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95, 106765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106765.
Chen, W., Yi, L., Wang, J., Zhang, J., & Jiang, Y. (2023). Evaluation of the livability of arid urban environments under global warming: A multi-parameter approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 99, Article 104931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104931.
Doan, Q. C., & Zhang, X. (2025). A systematic review of urban vitality studies: Trends and research opportunities. Land Use Policy, 158, 107745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107745.
Ebrahimi Jahromi, M., & Ashnavi Noshabadi, A. (2022). Prioritizing effective components on urban environmental quality (Case study: Shiraz city). Spatial Planning, 12(3), 47–66. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22287485.1401.12.3.2.6. [In Persian]
Eid, S., Khalifa, M., & Elrahman, A. (2021). Biophilic perceptions in the urban waterfront: Analytical study of the Nile waterfront in central Cairo. HBRC Journal, 17(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/16874048.2021.1872052.
Fatmadewi, R. (2024). Urban nature preservation and conservation strategies based on biophilic institutions and governance: A lesson learned from Gold Coast City for Indonesian cities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1310(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1310/1/012001.
Gadhi, A., Tiwari, A., & Qurnfulah, E. (2024). Biophilic urbanism’s impact on sustainable development: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Sustainable Development, 17(6), 1–_. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v17n6p1.
Ghasemi, K., Hamzenejad, M., & Meshkini, A. (2018). The spatial analysis of the livability of 22 districts of Tehran metropolis using multi-criteria decision making approaches. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 382–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.018.
Goerlich, F. J., & Reig, E. (2021). Quality of life ranking of Spanish cities: A non-compensatory approach. Cities, 109, Article 102979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102979.
Gong, Y., Zoltán, E. S., & János, G. (2023). Healthy dwelling: The perspective of biophilic design in the design of the living space. Buildings, 13(8), 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082020.
Gulsrud, N. M., Hertzog, K., & Shears, I. (2018). Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne? Investigating “green placemaking” as a nature-based solution. Environmental Research, 161, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.005.
Gür, M. (2023). Biophilic design as a tool for livable cities. Online Journal of Art & Design, 11(5), 142–160. https://adjournal.net/articles/115/11510.pdf.
Harms, P., & Hofer, M. (2024). Planning cities with nature for sustainability transformations: A systematic review. Urban Transformations, 6(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-024-00066-2.
Hung, S.-H. (2025). Does perceived biophilic design contribute to human well-being in urban green spaces? A study of perceived naturalness, biodiversity, perceived restorativeness, and subjective vitality. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 107, 128752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128752.
Hussein, W. A., & Al-Khafaji, A. S. (2023). Planning and preservation of natural areas in urban contexts: Application of biophilic approach in Kufa City. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(9), 2829–2837. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180921.
Jalalian, S., Tardast, Z., & Waysian, M. (2020). Explaining the biophilic citizen pattern (Case study: 9th and 10th districts of Tehran metropolis). Human Geography Research, 52(3), 993–1008. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2019.280543.1007915. [In Persian]
Jennings, V., & Bamkole, O. (2019). The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: An avenue for health promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030452
Jodder, P. K., Hossain, M. Z., & Thill, J.-C. (2025). Urban livability in a rapidly urbanizing mid-size city: Lessons for planning in the Global South. Sustainability, 17(4), 1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041504.
Kookana, R. S., Drechsel, P., Jamwal, P., & Vanderzalm, J. (2020). Urbanisation and emerging economies: Issues and potential solutions for water and food security. Science of the Total Environment, 732, 139057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139057.
Kwon, O. H., Hong, I., Yang, J., Wohn, D. Y., Jung, W. S., & Cha, M. (2021). Urban green space and happiness in developed countries. EPJ Data Science, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00278-7.
Lee, S., & Kim, Y. (2021). A framework of biophilic urbanism for improving climate change adaptability in urban environments. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 61, 127104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127104.
Lefosse, D. C., Naghibi, M., Luo, S., & van Timmeren, A. (2025). Biophilic urbanism across scales: Enhancing urban nature through experience and design. Land, 14(5), 1112. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14051112.
Lehmann, S. (2022). Green cities: Nature-based solutions, renaturing and rewilding cities. In Green cities (pp. 714–719). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87745-3_20.
Li, Y. R., Qiao, L. Y., Wang, Q. Y., & Karacsonyi, D. (2020). Towards the evaluation of rural livability in China: Theoretical framework and empirical case study. Habitat International, 105, Article 102241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102241.
Lucas, W. (2025). Living cities: A meta-analysis of biophilic design impacts on human and ecological outcomes. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5397935
Macke, J., Sarate, J. A. R., & Moschen, S. (2019). Smart sustainable cities evaluation and sense of community. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 118103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118103.
Mousavi, M., Jahangirzadeh, J., Bayramzadeh, N., & Omidvarfar, S. (2023). An analysis of the state of good governance in Urban Peripheral villages of Urmia. Preipheral Urban Spaces Development, 5(2), 221-236. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpusd.2023.397271.1270 [In Persian]
Oluwadare, D. M. (2025). The role of biophilic design in improving urban liveability. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 9(4), 1570–1576. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I4-1711584-7638.
O'Sullivan, K., Shirani, F., Hale, R., Pidgeon, N., & Henwood, K. (2023). Identity, place narrative and biophilic urban development: Connecting the past, present and future for sustainable liveable cities. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5, 1139029. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1139029.
Peters, T., & D'Penna, K. (2020). Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations. Sustainability, 12(17), 7064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177064.
Piracha, A., & Chaudhary, M. T. (2022). Urban air pollution, urban heat island and human health: A review of the literature. Sustainability, 14, 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159234.
Rahimi, M., Saniei, M., & Esmaeilzadeh, A. (2019). Assessment of spatial justice in the distribution and sustainable development of urban green space using entropy model and dispersion coefficient: A case study of the 10 districts of Shiraz. Quarterly of New Attitudes in Human Geography, 12(1), 277–292. https://journals.iau.ir/article_670363.html. [In Persian]
Ranjbaran, F., Majedi, H., & Zarabadi, S. (2024). How biophilic dimensions of Ramsar city affect the perception of citizens’ quality of life. Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies, 13(49), 95–112. http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-2143-fa.html. [In Persian]
Ristianti, N. (2024). Using biophilic design to enhance resilience of urban parks in Semarang City, Indonesia. Nakhara Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 23(1), 402. https://doi.org/10.54028/nj202423402.
Sá, A., & Viana, D. (2022). Sustainability in creative projects: Biophilia contributions. Modern Environmental Science and Engineering, 8(3), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.15341/mese(2333-2581)/03.08.2022/003.
Şahin, S., & Özdemir, Z. (2025). Evaluation of Amasya Hatuniye neighborhood and Yalıboyu houses in terms of biophilic city indicators. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Innovation in Architecture, Planning and Design (SIAP2025) (pp. 219–225). Gaziantep, Turkiye. https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.23.82.001.
Sasani, M., Sasani, Z., & Zabihi, H. (2020). Analysis of quality of life in deteriorated urban textures (Case study: Seyyed Zolfaqar neighborhood, Shiraz). Geography Quarterly (Regional Planning), 10(39), 821–832. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22286462.1399.10.39.18.5. [In Persian]
Sharifi, A., Roosta, M., & Javadpoor, M. (2021). Urban form resilience: A comparative analysis of traditional, semi-planned, and planned neighborhoods in Shiraz, Iran. Urban Science, 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5010018.
Sofeska, E. (2017). Understanding the livability in a city through smart solutions and urban planning toward developing sustainable livable future of the city of Skopje. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 37, 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.014.
Tahbaznia, A., Davarinezhad Moghaddam, M., & Hosseinian, N. (2026). Identifying key drivers of urban livability in Torghabeh: A foresight-based study. Journal of Geography and Regional Future Studies, 4(2), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.30466/grfs.2025.56496.1149. [In Persian]
Taqipour, A. A., Ahmadi Dehrashid, P., Mashaikhi, A., & Ayami, M. (2024). Investigating the dimensions of biophilic citizens and their assessment in urban society: A prelude to nature-oriented urban planning (Case study: Khaf city). Human Geography Research, 56(2), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2023.349515.1008547. [In Persian]
Tarek, S., & Ouf, A. (2021). Biophilic smart cities: The role of nature and technology in enhancing urban resilience. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-021-00042-8.
Twohig-Bennett, C., & Jones, A. (2018). The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental Research, 166, 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030.
United Nations. (2025). World urbanization prospects—Population division. United Nations. https://population.un.org/wup/.
Vafamehr, M., Yousefzadeh, A., & Mahdinia, M. H. (2024). Providing a conceptual model of livable space components with a biophilic perspective. Geography Quarterly (Regional Planning), 14(56), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.22034/jgeoq.2024.259164.2835. [In Persian]
Wang, K.-L., Qiao, Y.-J., Xu, R.-Y., Cheng, Y.-H., & Miao, Z. (2025). Smart city construction and urban livability: evidence from a quasi‑natural experiment in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 760. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05096-0.
Washbourne, C. (2022). Environmental policy narratives and urban green infrastructure: Reflections from five major cities in South Africa and the UK. Environmental Science & Policy, 129, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.12.016.
Xiao, Y., Chai, J., Wang, R., & Huang, H. (2022). Assessment and key factors of urban liveability in underdeveloped regions: A case study of the Loess Plateau, China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 79, Article 103674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103674.
Xu, W. (2024). Drivers of spontaneous plant communities in urban parks: A case from Nanjing, China. Sustainability, 16(9), 3841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093841.
Zare, A., Rezaei, M., & Loghayi, H. (2019). Explaining the effective components on improving environmental quality in historical urban textures (Case study: Historical texture of Shiraz). Urban Research & Planning, 38, 1–12. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22285229.1398.10.38.1.7. [In Persian]
Zarei, M., & Shahab, S. (2025). Nature‑Based Solutions in Urban Green Infrastructure: A Systematic Review of Success Factors and Implementation Challenges. Land, 14(4), 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040818
Zarie, E., Sepehri, B., Adibhesami, M. A., Pourjafar, M. R., & Karimi, H. (2024). A strategy for giving urban public green spaces a third dimension: A case study of Qasrodasht, Shiraz. Nature-Based Solutions, 5, 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100102.
Zhan, D., Kwan, M.-P., Zhang, W., Fan, J., Yu, J., & Dang, Y. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities, 79, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 12 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 12 |
||