دانشگاه ارومیه

 آمار

تعداد نشریات11
تعداد شماره‌ها136
تعداد مقالات1,373
تعداد مشاهده مقاله1,867,223
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله1,561,504
Mirzaei, Azizullah, Farhang, Maryam, Eslami, Zohreh. (1402). Reading-Based Incidental vs. Intentional Focus on Lexis and Development of L2 Phraseological Competence. پژوهش های میوه کاری, 11(2), 33-53. doi: 10.30466/ijltr.2023.121329
Azizullah Mirzaei; Maryam Farhang; Zohreh Eslami. "Reading-Based Incidental vs. Intentional Focus on Lexis and Development of L2 Phraseological Competence". پژوهش های میوه کاری, 11, 2, 1402, 33-53. doi: 10.30466/ijltr.2023.121329
Mirzaei, Azizullah, Farhang, Maryam, Eslami, Zohreh. (1402). 'Reading-Based Incidental vs. Intentional Focus on Lexis and Development of L2 Phraseological Competence', پژوهش های میوه کاری, 11(2), pp. 33-53. doi: 10.30466/ijltr.2023.121329
Mirzaei, Azizullah, Farhang, Maryam, Eslami, Zohreh. Reading-Based Incidental vs. Intentional Focus on Lexis and Development of L2 Phraseological Competence. پژوهش های میوه کاری, 1402; 11(2): 33-53. doi: 10.30466/ijltr.2023.121329

Reading-Based Incidental vs. Intentional Focus on Lexis and Development of L2 Phraseological Competence

Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research
دوره 11، شماره 2، مهر 2023، صفحه 33-53    اصل مقاله (724.43 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30466/ijltr.2023.121329
نویسندگان
Azizullah Mirzaei* 1؛ Maryam Farhang2؛ Zohreh Eslami3
1Department of English, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shahrekord University, Iran
2Department of English, Faculty of Letters & Humanities, Shahrekord University, Iran
3Texas A & M University, US
چکیده
Emergentist, usage-based L2 research has witnessed that emphasizing formulaic sequences as entry points in meaning-based instructional contexts contributes to the development of linguistic comprehension and production. Related studies have thus far striven to find the most effective methods of highlighting these word strings. This study explored the effects of the focus on lexis (FonL) approach on L2 learners’ development of phraseological competence. Furthermore, it probed whether incidental and intentional FonL approaches result in any differential effects on the learners’ development of phraseology. Participants were 60 L2 learners in three intact classes randomly assigned to one control and two experimental FonL groups. Their general language proficiency was measured by administering a Cambridge PET Test. Additionally, a pre-test was used to measure their prior knowledge of phraseology. The control group received the mainstream typical instruction, whereas the experimental groups received incidental versus intentional FonL, differentially heightening noticing of conventionalized lexis expressions in L2 reading. A parallel post-test was administered to measure the development of learners’ phraseological competence. ANCOVA results indicated that the lexis groups made greater gains in their phraseology as compared to the control group. Moreover, differential effects were evidenced specifically in favor of the use of intentional FonL. The findings indicate that the varied amount of attention L2 learners pay to aspects of formulaicity in language use can influence the extent to which lexis-based input and interaction lead to intake. Theoretical and pedagogical implications of the study are discussed at the end.
کلیدواژه‌ها
lexis؛ formulaic chunks؛ phraseological competence؛ focus on lexis (FonL)؛ usage-based language learning theories
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 249
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 587