آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 11 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 136 |
| تعداد مقالات | 1,373 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 1,866,259 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,559,788 |
Application of distance function and data envelopment analysis in efficiency evaluation of Islamic Azad University branches in East Azerbaijan province | ||
| Iranian Industrial Economics Studies | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 1، شماره 1، اسفند 2017، صفحه 53-62 اصل مقاله (1.01 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30466/iies.2018.51174.1010 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Khalil Jahangiri* ؛ Ali Rezazadeh1؛ Mohsen Poorebadollahan2 | ||
| 1Urmia University | ||
| 2tabriz university | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The main aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of Islamic Azad University branches in East Azerbaijan using stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) and to compare the findings with the results of data envelopment analysis (DEA). In this respect, SFA and DEA techniques were applied to measure production efficiency of 28 branches of East Azerbaijan Islamic Azad University considering the following variables as either output or input: 3 variables as output (including the number of graduated students and students accepted for the further pursuit of their studies, as well as the number of articles, books, and research projects) and 6 variables as input (including the number of university faculty members, educational fields, current students, staff working in different sections of the university, and the total university campus in square meters as well as university costs). Estimation of DEA and obtaining of the units' efficiency indicated that the average efficiency of the universities under investigation were 0.66 and 0.80 in SFA and DEA techniques, respectively. In addition, efficiency distributions in SFA and DEA methods were tremendously different from each other so that in SFA method nearly 40% while in DEA method more than 60% of unit efficiency was between 0.8-1 intervals. The minimum level of estimated efficiency (0.14) was observed for Hadishahr using SFA method, and in DEA approach, the minimum level of efficiency belonged to Khoda Afarin branch (0.065). | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| efficiency؛ Stochastic Frontier Analysis؛ Distance Function؛ Islamic Azad University؛ East Azarbaijan Province | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Afonso, A. and Santos, M. (2005, No 07). Students and teachers: A DEA approach to the relative efficiency of Portuguese public universities. Working Papers Department of Economics from ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Un.
Agasisti, T., Barra, C. and Zotti, R. (2016). Evaluating the efficiency of Italian public universities (2008e2011) in presence of (unobserved) heterogeneity. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 55, 47-58.
Aigner, D. J., C. A. K. Lovell and P. Schmidt. (1977). Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Economics, 6, 21- 37.
Alam Tabriz, A., Faraji, R., & Saeedi, H. (2010). Efficiency Evaluation Faculties of Shahid Beheshti University using Composed Approach of DEA and Goal Programming Model. Industrial Management Studies, 19, 1-22. (in persian).
Alirezaee, M. R., Cheraghali, Z., & Rakhshan, F. (2016). Efficiency measurement of selected insurance companies using two-stage DEA models along with window analysis . Insurance Bulletin, 124, 1-24. (in persian).
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operation Research, 429-444.
Coelli, T. J. and S. Perelman. (1996). Efficiency Measurement, Multi-Output Technologies and Distance Functions: With Application to European Railways. Crepp Wp 96/05. Centre de Recherche en Economie Publique Et Economie de la Population. Université de Liè.
Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 273-292.
Duman, Y. S. and Kasman, A. (2018). Environmental technical efficiency in EU member and candidate countries: A parametric hyperbolic distance function approach. Energy, 147, 297-307.
Entezari, Y. (2008). Efficiency analysis of knowledge firms as knowledge producers using stochastic frontier model. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 49, 23-43. (in persian).
Entezari, Y., Taei, H., & Arabmazar Yazdi, A. (2007). Efficiency analysis of knowledge firms as knowledge producers using stochastic frontier model. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 45, 1-30. (in persian).
Farell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 253-281.
Ganley, J. & Cubbin, J. (1992). public sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis. North Holland: Amsterdam .
Hadian, E., & Azimi Hosseini, A. (2004). Measuring the efficiency of the Iranian banking system using DEA approach. Quarterly of Iranian Economic Research, 20, 1-25. (in persian).
Koopmans, T. C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. New York: Wiley.
Kumbhakar, S. C. & A. K. Lovell. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis, . Cambridge University Press.
Lovell, C. A. K., S. Richardson, P. Travers and L. Wood . (1994). Resources and Functionings: A New View of Inequality in Australia, ed. W. Eichhorn. ., (pp. 787-807). Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
Mashayekhi, B., & Shafipour, S. M. (2012). Evaluate the efficiency of the educational system majoring in Accounting at Iranian universities, using the techniques of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Review, 19 (67), 119-142.
Mikusova, P. (2015). An application of DEA methodology in efficiency measurement of the Czech public universities. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 569-578.
Mizala A., Romaguera, P. and Dario Farren. (2002). The technical efficiency of schools in Chile, Applied Economics. Taylor and Francis Journals, 34(12), 1533-1552.
Mo'meni, M., & Shahkhah, N. (2009). Evaluating the efficiency of Iran insurance firms using two-phase communication data envelopment model. Insurance Bulletin, 94, , 45-72 . (in persian).
Moreira López, V.H., Bravo-Ureta, B.E., Arzubi, A. and E. Schilder. (2006). Multi-output Technical Efficiency for Argentinean Dairy Farms Using Stochastic Production and Stochastic Distance Frontiers with Unbalanced Panel Data. Economía Agraria, 10, 97-106.
Safdari Ranjbar, M., Khalili, M., Azami, A., & Sabzekar, A. (2013). Efficiency evaluation of faculties from the viewpoint of knowledge creation, using data envelopment analysis: A case study of Amirkabir University of Technology. Journal of Operational Research and Its Applications (Journal of Applied Mathematics), 37, 61-76. (in persian).
Sagarra, M., Mar-Molinero, C. and Agasisti, T. (2017). Exploring the efficiency of Mexican universities: Integrating data envelopment analysis and multidimensional scaling. Omega, 67, 123-133.
Shafiee, M. (2017). Application of Data Envelopment Analysis model for evaluating the efficiency of financial institutions. Journal of Operational Research in Its Applications, 41-66.
Shephard, R. (1953). Cost and Production Functions. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Pres.
Shoja, N., & Darvish Motevali, M. H. (2015). . Evaluating the effectiveness of research activities in Islamic Azad University branches: Data envelopment analysis (DEA). Quarterly of Economic Modeling, 32, 123-141. (in persian).
Shoja, N., & Darvish Motevali, M. H. (2015). Evaluating the effectiveness of research activities in Islamic Azad University branches: Data envelopment analysis (DEA),, . (n.d.). Quarterly of Economic Modeling, 32, 123-141. (in persian).
Yamori, N., Harimaya, K. and Tomimura, K. (2017). the efficiency of Japanese financial cooperatives: An application of parametric distance functions. Journal of Economics & Business, 94, 43-53.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 866 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 517 |
||